Factors associated with engagement in online self-help programs among people with suicidal thoughts

dc.contributor.authorBatterham, Philip
dc.contributor.authorHan, Jin
dc.contributor.authorMackinnon, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorWerner-Seidler, Aliza
dc.contributor.authorCalear, Alison
dc.contributor.authorWong, Quincy J. J.
dc.contributor.authorTorok, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Helen
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-05T00:19:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-13
dc.date.updated2020-07-06T08:24:04Z
dc.description.abstractBackground The effectiveness of internet-based self-help programs for mental health may be limited by low engagement. Identifying factors associated with engagement in online interventions assists in developing strategies to improve efficacy through greater engagement. The aim of the current study was to identify factors associated with engagement among people with suicidal thoughts who completed an online program. Method 418 adults with suicidal ideation were recruited online into a randomized controlled trial of a 6-week internet-based self-help program. Program usage for the intervention and active control conditions was measured as the number of logins and modules accessed. Predictors of program usage and between-group differences were examined, including sociodemographic variables, user preferences and mental health status. Results Both the control group and the intervention group accessed approximately three modules (M = 3.1, SD = 2.0 v. M = 2.8, SD = 2.1, respectively), although participants in the intervention group had a significantly higher number of logins (17.3 vs 9.7, p < 0.001). Across both conditions, individuals with more severe suicidal thoughts had better engagement with their respective program. More logins for both programs were also associated with being female, married or in a de-facto relationship, not employed, less severe depression and less willingness to seek help from informal sources. Limitations Metrics of adherence may not directly reflect engagement with the program. There may be additional unmeasured factors associated with engagement. Conclusions The findings suggest that different engagement strategies may be required depending on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Tailoring interventions to at-risk subgroups may optimise health and functional outcomes.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by a grant from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC; GNT1046317) and forms part of the program of research conducted by the NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Suicide Prevention (GNT1042580). PJB, ALC, MT and HC are supported by NHMRC fellowships 1158707, 1122544, 1138710 and 1056964.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0165-0327en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/213775
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenance"The Accepted Version can be archived in an Institutional Repository. 24 Months. CC BY-NC-ND." from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 18/12/2020).
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1046317en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1042580en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1122544en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1138710en_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1056964en_AU
dc.rights© 2020 Elsevier B.V.en_AU
dc.sourceJournal of Affective Disordersen_AU
dc.subjectAdherenceen_AU
dc.subjectEngagementen_AU
dc.subjectSuicideen_AU
dc.subjectInternet interventionsen_AU
dc.titleFactors associated with engagement in online self-help programs among people with suicidal thoughtsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-12
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage409en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage402en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBatterham, Philip, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHan, Jin, Black Dog Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMackinnon, Andrew, Black Dog Institute (UNSW)en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWerner-Seidler, Aliza, Black Dog Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationCalear (previously Neil), Alison, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWong, Quincy J. J., Black Dog Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTorok, Michelle, Black Dog Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChristensen, Helen, Black Dog Instituteen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidBatterham, Philip, u4435982en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidCalear (previously Neil), Alison, u4245801en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111714 - Mental Healthen_AU
local.identifier.absseo920410 - Mental Healthen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4102339xPUB462en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume265en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.044en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_AU
local.type.statusAccepted Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
HT_Adherence predictors accepted 20191122.pdf
Size:
166.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format