Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Organisation, motivations and case studies of Japanese direct investment in real estate 1985-94

dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Rogeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-04-05en_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-19T09:11:30Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:29:28Z
dc.date.available2004-05-19T09:11:30Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:29:28Z
dc.date.created1998en_US
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.description.abstractBetween 1985 and 1994 there was a remarkable rise and decline in Japanese real estate investment abroad which has been little documented or analysed, despite its economic scale and political impact. This paper is a further exploration of the nature and causes of this form of investment, following on from a broader study of its determinants in Pacific Economic Paper No. 271 of September 1997. It provides supporting evidence, through an examination of the organisation and motivations of investors, for the hypothesis that Japanese investors in real estate were predominantly influenced by the financial environment in Japan after the mid 1980s, rather than by more strategic factors such as their firm-specific advantages. According to traditional industrial organisation theory, FDI (foreign direct investment) is associated with investor control over assets and an active managerial role by investors. Hence, the purpose of FDI is to pursue a strategic international expansion by a firm, based on its specific proprietary advantages over local firms (Dunning 1981; 1993). Notably, Hymer (1976) categorised active investment as type II if it involved both control and management; alternatively, inactive investment, without control, is categorised as type I in nature. Evidence is provided that the corporate and financial organisational structure of Japanese real estate FDI did not exhibit type II features to any significant extent. It is argued that the organisational and corporate strengths of Japanese firms explain little of the pattern of real estate FDI over the 10 years in review. The paper concludes that Japanese real estate investment appears to be an exception to the traditional firm-specific model of FDI.en_US
dc.format.extent276319 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent352 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/40468en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/40468
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.subjectJapanen_US
dc.subjectAustraliaen_US
dc.subjectFDIen_US
dc.subjectforeign direct investmenten_US
dc.subjectreal estateen_US
dc.subjectfinancial environmenten_US
dc.titleOrganisation, motivations and case studies of Japanese direct investment in real estate 1985-94en_US
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_US
local.citationPacific Economic Papers No.282en_US
local.contributor.affiliationAPSEGen_US
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_US
local.description.refereedyesen_US
local.identifier.citationmonthaugen_US
local.identifier.citationyear1998en_US
local.identifier.eprintid2468en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
pep-282.pdf
Size:
269.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format