Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Unifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection

dc.contributor.authorKokko, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorJennions, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBrooks, Rob
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T22:31:10Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.updated2015-12-07T10:14:00Z
dc.description.abstractSexual reproduction is associated with the evolution of anisogamy and sperm-producing males and egg-laying females. The ensuing competition for mates has led to sexual selection and coevolution of the sexes. Mathematical models are extensively used to test the plausibility of different complicated scenarios for the evolution of sexual traits. Unfortunately, the diversity of models is now itself equally bewildering. Here we clarify some of the current debate by reviewing evolutionary explanations for the relationship between anisogamy, potential reproductive rates, parental care, sex roles, and mate choice. We review the benefits females might gain by mating with certain males rather than others. We also consider other forms of selection that can make females mate nonrandomly. One way empiricists can contribute to resolving theoretical disputes is to quantify the cost of expressing mating biases in the appropriate life-history currency.
dc.identifier.issn1543-592X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/22652
dc.publisherAnnual Reviews Inc
dc.sourceAnnual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics
dc.subjectKeywords: behavioral response; coevolution; mate choice; numerical model; parental care; reproductive behavior; sexual reproduction; sexual selection; testing method Anisogamy; Female choice; Mate choice; Sex roles; Sexual conflict
dc.titleUnifying and Testing Models of Sexual Selection
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage66
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage43
local.contributor.affiliationKokko, Hanna, University of Helsinki
local.contributor.affiliationJennions, Michael, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationBrooks, Rob, University of New South Wales
local.contributor.authoruidJennions, Michael, u4037305
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor060201 - Behavioural Ecology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu9511635xPUB22
local.identifier.citationvolume37
local.identifier.doi10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110259
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-33751165434
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Kokko_Unifying_and_Testing_Models_of_2006.pdf
Size:
214.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format