Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe

dc.contributor.authorVan Doesum, Niels J
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Ryan O
dc.contributor.authorGallucci, Marcello
dc.contributor.authorAharonov-Majar, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorAu, Wing Tung
dc.contributor.authorBay, Liying
dc.contributor.authorBohm, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBovina, Inna
dc.contributor.authorBuchan, Nancy R
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiao-Ping
dc.contributor.authorPlatow, Michael J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T01:24:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T01:24:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-10-09T07:17:08Z
dc.description.abstractHumans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one's location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries' better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipC.P. passed away during the time we were working on the manuscript; we are grateful for his valuable contributions to this research. We thank Daniel Balliet for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. Research was supported in part by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) under Grant No. 022.003.040, awarded to P.A.M.V.L. The contributions of M.H. and S. Graf were supported by Grant No. 20-01214S from the Czech Science Foundation and by Rozvoj Výzkumné Organizace (Development of a Research Organization): RVO 68081740 of the Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences. The contribution of R.G. was supported by the Centre for Social Conflict and Cohesion Studies (ANID/FONDAL 15130009) and the Center for Intercultural and Indigenous Research (ANID/FONDAP 15110006). The contribution of G.J.L. was supported by Standard Research Grant No. 410-2010-1221 from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. The contributions of S. Gächter and O.W. were supported by the European Research Council Grant No. ERC-AdG 295707 COOPERATIONen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/313893
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercialNoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).en_AU
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences (USA)en_AU
dc.rights© 2021 The authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licenceen_AU
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourcePNAS - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americaen_AU
dc.subjectsocial mindfulnessen_AU
dc.subjectcross-national differencesen_AU
dc.subjectlow-cost cooperationen_AU
dc.titleSocial mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globeen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue35en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationVan Doesum, Niels J, Leiden Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMurphy, Ryan O, University of Zuerichen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGallucci, Marcello, University of Milano-Bicoccaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAharonov-Majar, Ursula, University of Grazen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAu, Wing Tung, The Chinese University of Hong Kongen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBay, Liying, Fuzhou Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBohm, Robert, University of Copenhagenen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBovina, Inna, Moscow State University of Psychology and Educationen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBuchan, Nancy R, University of South Carolinaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationChen, Xiao-Ping, University of Washingtonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPlatow, Michael, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailu4039917@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidPlatow, Michael, u4039917en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor520505 - Social psychologyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo200401 - Behaviour and healthen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB22075en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume118en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2023846118en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85113369710
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000700327400001
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.pnas.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
van-doesum-et-al-2021-social-mindfulness-and-prosociality-vary-across-the-globe.pdf
Size:
663.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: