Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The shift to occupational health and safety process standards in Australia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Johnstone, Richard
Quinlan, Michael

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Edward Elgar Publishing

Abstract

This chapter introduces OHS regulation in Australia. After providing a brief outline of the Australian political, economic, social and industrial relations framework, the chapter then explains how, from the late 1970s, Australian OHS regulation moved from a reliance on detailed, technical specification standards, to a "general duties" model, which increasingly required duty-holders (particularly employers) to adopt risk-management approaches. From the late 1980s, as part of a national uniformity process under the auspices of the National Occupational Health and Safety Commission (NOHSC), OHS regulations and codes of practice underpinning the general duties were largely recast to require duty-holders to follow risk-management processes when addressing specific hazards. From 2004 several OHS statutes explicitly required duty-holders to implement riskmanagement processes when complying with the general duties. Legislative reforms beginning in the 1970s also gave OHS inspectorates administrative sanctions (improvement and prohibition notices, and in some jurisdictions infringement notices) and recently the power to accept enforceable undertakings from duty-holders. The traditional right to prosecute was strengthened by significantly raising the level of fines available to the courts, and lately, by vesting some courts with non-pecuniary sanctions such as the power to order court-ordered publicity and OHS projects.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Regulating Workplace Risks: A Comparative Study of Inspection Regimes in Times of Change

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31