Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Judge Networks

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Dressel, Bjoern

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Oxford Academic

Abstract

Judge networks—the interlocking, relatively stable relationships that a judge maintains with peers and other political and social actors on and o the bench—are widely suspected of exerting inuence on judicial behaviour. Nevertheless, few scholars have studied whether and how that may happen in theory or practice. This chapter engages with the comparative judicial politics literature to show how judge networks can be understood from a relational perspective. Based on the ndings, a basic heuristic framework—settings, motivations, and mechanisms—is proposed to improve understanding of how judge networks inuence judicial decision-making. The discussion covers both the potential and the limitations of a judge-centred relational perspective on the study of judicial decision-making in the Global South and beyond.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Judicial Behaviour

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads