Recasting common security
Abstract
The recent debate on new approaches to security has been marked by a mixture of platitudinous observations and an ad hoc search for policy relevance. This has lead to: (a) shallow theory and (b) a drift away from the radicalism implied in some early notions of 'common' security; the movement has tended to be towards relatively conservative thinking on 'cooperative' security. As a result of this, the debate has not been particularly profound. Nevertheless, it is possible to breath new life into the issue.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description