Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: Implications for management and restoration

dc.contributor.authorLe Maitre, David
dc.contributor.authorGaertner, Mirijam
dc.contributor.authorMarchante, Elizabete
dc.contributor.authorEns, Emilie-Jane
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorPauchard, Anı´bal
dc.contributor.authorO’Farrell, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorBlanchard, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorBlignaut, James
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, David
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T22:15:33Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:24:51Z
dc.description.abstractAim The biophysical impacts of invasive Australian acacias and their effects on ecosystem services are explored and used to develop a framework for improved restoration practices. Location South Africa, Portugal and Chile. Methods A conceptual model of ecosystem responses to the increasing severity (density and duration) of invasions was developed from the literature and our knowledge of how these impacts affect options for restoration. Case studies are used to identify similarities and differences between three regions severely affected by invasions of Australian acacias: Acacia dealbata in Chile, Acacia longifolia in Portugal and Acacia saligna in South Africa. Results Australian acacias have a wide range of impacts on ecosystems that increase with time and disturbance, transform ecosystems and alter and reduce ecosystem service delivery. A shared trait is the accumulation of massive seed banks, which enables them to become dominant after disturbances. Ecosystem trajectories and recovery potential suggest that there are important thresholds in ecosystem state and resilience. When these are crossed, options for restoration are radically altered; in many cases, autogenic (self-driven and self-sustaining) recovery to a pre-invasion condition is inhibited, necessitating active intervention to restore composition and function. Main conclusions The conceptual model demonstrates the degree, nature and reversibility of ecosystem degradation and identifies key actions needed to restore ecosystems to desired states. Control and restoration operations, particularly active restoration, require substantial short- to medium-term investments, which can reduce losses of biodiversity and ecosystem services, and the costs to society in the long term. Increasing restoration effectiveness will require further research into linkages between impacts and restoration. This research should involve scientists, practitioners and managers engaged in invasive plant control and restoration programmes, together with society as both the investors in, and beneficiaries of, more effective restoration.
dc.identifier.issn1366-9516
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/70460
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
dc.sourceDiversity and Distributions
dc.subjectKeywords: biological invasion; ecological impact; ecosystem function; ecosystem resilience; ecosystem response; ecosystem service; environmental degradation; environmental disturbance; invasive species; legume; population regulation; restoration ecology; seed bank; Acacia; Biodiversity loss; Biological invasions; Degradation ecology; Ecosystem functions; Ecosystem services; Impact mechanisms; Invasive species; Seed banks; Soil nutrients
dc.titleImpacts of invasive Australian acacias: Implications for management and restoration
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue5
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1029
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1015
local.contributor.affiliationLe Maitre, David, CSIR
local.contributor.affiliationGaertner, Mirijam, Stellenbosch University
local.contributor.affiliationMarchante, Elizabete, University of Coimbra
local.contributor.affiliationEns, Emilie-Jane, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationHolmes, Patricia, Environmental Resource Management
local.contributor.affiliationPauchard, Anı´bal, Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity (IEB)
local.contributor.affiliationO’Farrell, Patrick, CSIR
local.contributor.affiliationRogers, Andrew, Stellenbosch University
local.contributor.affiliationBlanchard, Ryan, CSIR
local.contributor.affiliationBlignaut, James, University of Pretoria
local.contributor.affiliationRichardson, David, Stellenbosch University
local.contributor.authoruidEns, Emilie-Jane, u4593733
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050103 - Invasive Species Ecology
local.identifier.absfor050205 - Environmental Management
local.identifier.absfor050202 - Conservation and Biodiversity
local.identifier.absseo970105 - Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
local.identifier.absseo960505 - Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Forest and Woodlands Environments
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB2318
local.identifier.citationvolume17
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00816.x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-79961144752
local.identifier.thomsonID000294655400018
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Le Maitre_Impacts_of_invasive_Australian_2011.pdf
Size:
509.84 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format