The indentation hardness of silicon measured by instrumented indentation: What does it mean?
Loading...
Date
Authors
Haberl, Bianca
Bayu Aji, Leonardus Bimo
Williams, J. S.
Bradby, Jodie E.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Abstract
The indentation hardness of three different pure forms of silicon was investigated by two different
methods. The hardness was probed by direct imaging of the residual impressions and by
instrumented indentation using the Oliver–Pharr method. The forms of silicon used were a
defective form of amorphous silicon, an amorphous form close to a continuous random network,
and a crystalline silicon. The first form deforms via plastic flow and the latter two via phase
transition. Two different unloading rates, fast and slow, were used to vary the phase transition
behavior. This influenced the relative hardness as measured by instrumented indentation, which is
not a reliable method to quantify hardness values in phase transforming materials. Thus, for our
phase transforming silicon system, the relative hardness between samples can only be determined
correctly by direct imaging, provided that the image accurately reveals the extent of the phase
transformed volume.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of Materials Research