Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Have policy process scholars embraced causal mechanisms? A review of five popular frameworks

dc.contributor.authorvan der Heijden, Jeroen
dc.contributor.authorKuhlmann, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorLindquist, Evert
dc.contributor.authorWellstead, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-12T02:06:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.updated2022-02-27T07:17:39Z
dc.description.abstractOver 30 years, several key frameworks and theories of the policy process have emerged which have guided a burgeoning empirical literature. A more recent development has been a growing interest in the application of a ‘causal mechanism’ perspective to policy studies. This article reviews selected theories of the policy process (Multiple Streams Approach, Advocacy Coalition Framework, Punctuated Equilibrium Theory, Narrative Framework Theory, and Institutional Analysis and Development Framework) and reports on an exploratory meta-analysis and synthesis to gauge the take-up of causalmechanistic approaches. The findings suggest that there has been limited application of causal mechanisms and calls for more theoretical and empirical work on that aspect. Given the overlapping frameworks exploring different aspects of the policy process, further research informed by causal-mechanism approaches points to a new generation of inquiry across these and other policy process theoretical frameworks.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0952-0767en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/216048
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherSage Publications Inc
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019
dc.sourcePublic Policy and Administration
dc.subjectAdvocacy coalition framework
dc.subjectcausal mechanisms
dc.subjectinstitutional analysis and development
dc.subjectmultiple streams approach
dc.subjectnarrative policy framework
dc.subjectpunctuated equilibrium theory
dc.subjecttheories of the policy process
dc.titleHave policy process scholars embraced causal mechanisms? A review of five popular frameworks
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue2
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage24en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationVan der Heijden, Jeroen, College of Asia and the Pacific, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKuhlmann, Johanna, University of Braunschweigen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLindquist, Evert, University of Victoriaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationWellstead, Adam, Michigan Technological Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidVan der Heijden, Jeroen, u5055924en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor160609 - Political Theory and Political Philosophyen_AU
local.identifier.absseo940204 - Public Services Policy Advice and Analysisen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB11992en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume36
local.identifier.doi10.1177/0952076718814894en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85064568658
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.uk.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201778en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Van+der+Heijden_Have_policy_process_scholars_2019.pdf
Size:
268.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format