Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Modelling climate change responses in tropical forests: similar productivity estimates across five models, but different mechanisms and responses

dc.contributor.authorRowland, L.
dc.contributor.authorHarper, A.
dc.contributor.authorChristoffersen, B. O.
dc.contributor.authorGalbraith, D. R.
dc.contributor.authorImbuzeiro, H. M. A.
dc.contributor.authorPowell, T. L.
dc.contributor.authorDoughty, C.
dc.contributor.authorLevine, N. M.
dc.contributor.authorMalhi, Y.
dc.contributor.authorSaleska, S. R.
dc.contributor.authorMoorcroft, P. R.
dc.contributor.authorMeir, P.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, M.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-11T00:18:39Z
dc.date.available2015-09-11T00:18:39Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-21
dc.description.abstractAccurately predicting the response of Amazonia to climate change is important for predicting climate change across the globe. Changes in multiple climatic factors simultaneously result in complex non-linear ecosystem responses, which are difficult to predict using vegetation models. Using leaf- and canopy-scale observations, this study evaluated the capability of five vegetation models (Community Land Model version 3.5 coupled to the Dynamic Global Vegetation model – CLM3.5–DGVM; Ecosystem Demography model version 2 – ED2; the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator version 2.1 – JULES; Simple Biosphere model version 3 – SiB3; and the soil–plant–atmosphere model – SPA) to simulate the responses of leaf- and canopy-scale productivity to changes in temperature and drought in an Amazonian forest. The models did not agree as to whether gross primary productivity (GPP) was more sensitive to changes in temperature or precipitation, but all the models were consistent with the prediction that GPP would be higher if tropical forests were 5 °C cooler than current ambient temperatures. There was greater model–data consistency in the response of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) to changes in temperature than in the response to temperature by net photosynthesis (An), stomatal conductance (gs) and leaf area index (LAI). Modelled canopy-scale fluxes are calculated by scaling leaf-scale fluxes using LAI. At the leaf-scale, the models did not agree on the temperature or magnitude of the optimum points of An, Vcmax or gs, and model variation in these parameters was compensated for by variations in the absolute magnitude of simulated LAI and how it altered with temperature. Across the models, there was, however, consistency in two leaf-scale responses: (1) change in An with temperature was more closely linked to stomatal behaviour than biochemical processes; and (2) intrinsic water use efficiency (IWUE) increased with temperature, especially when combined with drought. These results suggest that even up to fairly extreme temperature increases from ambient levels (+6 °C), simulated photosynthesis becomes increasingly sensitive to gs and remains less sensitive to biochemical changes. To improve the reliability of simulations of the response of Amazonian rainforest to climate change, the mechanistic underpinnings of vegetation models need to be validated at both leaf- and canopy-scales to improve accuracy and consistency in the quantification of processes within and across an ecosystem.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was enabled by a grant from the Andes–Amazon Initiative of The Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. L. Rowland gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Natural Environment Research Council (UK) for a NERC PhD studentship, and NERC grant NE/J011002/1; PM also acknowledges support from ARC FT110100457.en_AU
dc.identifier.issn1991-9603en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/15335
dc.publisherEuropean Geosciences Unionen_AU
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FT110100457en_AU
dc.rights© Author(s) 2015. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.en_AU
dc.sourceGeoscientific Model Developmenten_AU
dc.titleModelling climate change responses in tropical forests: similar productivity estimates across five models, but different mechanisms and responsesen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-03-27
local.bibliographicCitation.issue4en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage1110en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1097en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationMeir, P., Research School of Biology, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu4875047en_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB1502
local.identifier.citationvolume8en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.5194/gmd-8-1097-2015en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.egu.eu/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rowland et al Modelling Climate Change Responses 2015.pdf
Size:
1.58 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: