Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate

dc.contributor.authorCompston, Paul
dc.contributor.authorCantwell, Wesley J
dc.contributor.authorCardew-Hall, Michael
dc.contributor.authorKalyanasundaram, Shankar
dc.contributor.authorMosse, Luke
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-13T23:07:49Z
dc.date.issued2004
dc.date.updated2015-12-12T08:10:54Z
dc.description.abstractThe permanent strain on the surface of a channel-formed aluminum-polypropylene laminate was compared to monolithic aluminum. The materials used in this study were 5005-H34 aluminum and a self-reinforced polypropylene (Curv, BP). Microscopic examination of the sidewall edge, prior to taking the strain measurements, confirmed the absence of delamination. The results show that the aluminum-Curv laminate exhibits low strain and is not influenced by a change in tool radii, which makes it efficient to solve the problems associated with stamping of traditional monolithic metals.
dc.identifier.issn0022-2461
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/86372
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.sourceJournal of Materials Science
dc.subjectKeywords: Aluminum; Aluminum compounds; Composite materials; Delamination; Interfaces (materials); Laminates; Materials science; Microscopic examination; Polypropylenes; Sandwich structures; Strain; Surface phenomena; Thickness control; Cold forming; Engineering st
dc.titleComparison of surface strain for stamp formed aluminum and an aluminum-polypropylene laminate
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue19
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage6088
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage6087
local.contributor.affiliationCompston, Paul, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationCantwell, Wesley J, University of Liverpool
local.contributor.affiliationCardew-Hall, Michael, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationKalyanasundaram, Shankar, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMosse, Luke, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU
local.contributor.authoruidCompston, Paul, u4022467
local.contributor.authoruidCardew-Hall, Michael, u9300551
local.contributor.authoruidKalyanasundaram, Shankar, u9511193
local.contributor.authoruidMosse, Luke, u3162587
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor091299 - Materials Engineering not elsewhere classified
local.identifier.ariespublicationMigratedxPub15235
local.identifier.citationvolume39
local.identifier.doi10.1023/B:JMSC.0000041707.68685.72
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-4544346215
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Compston_Comparison_of_surface_strain_2004.pdf
Size:
86.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format