Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Founding Factions: How Majorities Shifted and Aligned to Shape the U.S. Constitution

dc.contributor.authorPope, Jeremy C.
dc.contributor.authorTreier, Shawn
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-07T22:40:32Z
dc.date.available2022-11-07T22:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2021-11-28T07:26:42Z
dc.description.abstractThe fundamental importance of the 1787 Constitutional Convention continues to affect contemporary politics. The Constitution defines the structure and limits of the American system of government, and it organizes contemporary debates about policy and legal issues—debates that explicitly invoke the intentions and actions of those delegates to the Convention. Virtually all scholarship emphasizes the importance of compromise between key actors or factions at the Convention. In truth, the deep structure of voting at the Convention remains somewhat murky because the traditional stories are incomplete. There were three key factions at the Convention, not two. The alliance of the core reformers with the slave interests helped change representation and make a stronger national government. When it came time to create a strong executive, a group of small state delegates provided the crucial votes. Traditional accounts gloss over the complicated coalition politics that produced these important compromises, while this book shows the specific voting alignments. It is true that the delegates came with common purposes, but they were divided by both interests and ideas into three crosscutting factions. There was no persistent dominant coalition of reformers or nationalists; rather, there was a series of minority factions allying with one another on the major issues to fashion the compromise. Founding Factions helps us understand the nature of shifting majorities and how they created the American government. https://www.press.umich.edu/11388330/founding_factionsen_AU
dc.format.extent207en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-472-13222-5en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/278330
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan Pressen_AU
dc.relation.isversionof1 Edition
dc.rights© 2020 University of Michigan Pressen_AU
dc.subjectPolitical Science:American Politicsen_AU
dc.subjectPolitical Science:Governanceen_AU
dc.subjectPolitical Science:Political Historyen_AU
dc.titleFounding Factions: How Majorities Shifted and Aligned to Shape the U.S. Constitutionen_AU
dc.typeBooken_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage207en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.placeofpublicationAnn Arbor
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPope , Jeremy C. , Brigham Young Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTreier, Shawn, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidTreier, Shawn, u5409634en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.description.refereedYes
local.identifier.absfor440899 - Political science not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo230299 - Government and politics not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB20623en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.3998/mpub.11388330en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.fulcrum.org/en_AU
local.type.statusMetadata onlyen_AU

Downloads