Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Bordia, Prashant
Irmer, Bernd
Abusah, David

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis

Abstract

Knowledge sharing is an essential component of effective knowledge management. However, evaluation apprehension, or the fear that your work may be critiqued, can inhibit knowledge sharing. Using the general framework of social exchange theory, we examined the effects of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefit of knowledge sharing (such as enhanced reputation) on employees' knowledge sharing intentions in two contexts: interpersonal (i.e., by direct contact between two employees) and database (i.e., via repositories). Evaluation apprehension was negatively associated with knowledge sharing intentions in both contexts while perceived benefit was only positively associated with knowledge sharing intentions in the database context. Moreover, compared to the interpersonal context, evaluation apprehension was higher and knowledge sharing lower in the database context. Finally, the negative effects of evaluation apprehension upon knowledge sharing intentions were worse when perceived benefits were low compared to when perceived benefits were high.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31