Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Feasibility of conducting a randomized control trial for liver cancer screening: Is a randomized controlled trial for liver cancer screening feasible or still needed?

dc.contributor.authorPoustchi, Hossein
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorStrasser, Simone
dc.contributor.authorLee, Alice U
dc.contributor.authorMcCaughan, Geoffrey W
dc.contributor.authorGeorge, Jacob
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T22:17:04Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:55:41Z
dc.description.abstractScreening for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is commonly practiced and recommended in published guidelines, but evidence for its efficacy has been controversial. We tested the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis and followed up those offered screening to detect clinical outcomes. Participation was offered to patients with cirrhosis attending liver clinics at three university hospitals. Following discussion, patients received a decision aid (DA) that outlined the risks and benefits of surveillance. The proposed screening program comprised ultrasonography 6-monthly and serum alpha-fetoprotein every 3 months. We envisaged five groups of patients: those who agreed to randomization, those choosing nonrandomized screening, those wanting continuation of usual care, those who were undecided, and those refusing participation. Among 205 patients, 204 (99.5%) declined randomization. Of these, 181 (88%) elected for a nonrandomized screening program, 10% chose usual care (which typically included ad hoc screening), and two were undecided. Among 176 patients fluent in English communication skills, 160 (91%) preferred nonrandomized screening compared with 22/29 (76%) patients needing an interpreter (P < 0.026). Of 173 patients in nonrandomized screening followed up for a mean 13.5 ± 6.04 months, three developed HCC, two died from nonliver-related causes, and one underwent liver transplantation for liver failure. Eighteen of 21 patients in "usual care" received ad hoc screening. A simultaneous survey on the quality of the DA showed that the majority of participants believed that the information provided was unbiased. Conclusion: Although an RCT is theoretically ideal for determining the efficacy, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of HCC screening, informed patients prefer surveillance. A randomized study of HCC screening is not feasible when informed consent is imparted. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;)
dc.identifier.issn0270-9139
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/51239
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co
dc.sourceHepatology
dc.subjectKeywords: alpha fetoprotein; adult; aged; article; cancer screening; communication skill; echography; feasibility study; female; follow up; human; liver cancer; liver cirrhosis; major clinical study; male; outcome assessment; priority journal; protein blood level;
dc.titleFeasibility of conducting a randomized control trial for liver cancer screening: Is a randomized controlled trial for liver cancer screening feasible or still needed?
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2004
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1998
local.contributor.affiliationPoustchi, Hossein, Tehran University of Medical Science and Westmead Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationFarrell, Geoffrey, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationStrasser, Simone, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationLee, Alice U, Concord Repatriation General Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationMcCaughan, Geoffrey W, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
local.contributor.affiliationGeorge, Jacob, University of Sydney
local.contributor.authoruidFarrell, Geoffrey, u4028700
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor110307 - Gastroenterology and Hepatology
local.identifier.ariespublicationf5625xPUB220
local.identifier.citationvolume54
local.identifier.doi10.1002/hep.24581
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-80052949031
local.identifier.thomsonID000297974900012
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Poustchi_Feasibility_of_conducting_a_2011.pdf
Size:
115 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd