Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Meeting report: Knowledge and gaps in developing microbial criteria for inland recreational waters

dc.contributor.authorDorevitch, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorAshbolt, Nicholas J
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Christobel
dc.contributor.authorFujioka, Roger
dc.contributor.authorMcGee, Charles D.
dc.contributor.authorSoller, Jeffrey A.
dc.contributor.authorWhitman, Richard L.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-10T23:01:34Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T08:31:06Z
dc.description.abstractThe U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has committed to issuing in 2012 new or revised criteria designed to protect the health of those who use surface waters for recreation. For this purpose, the U.S. EPA has been conducting epidemiologic studies to establish relationships between microbial measures of water quality and adverse health outcomes among swimmers. New methods for testing water quality that would provide same-day results will likely be elements of the new criteria. Although the epidemiologic studies upon which the criteria will be based were conducted at Great Lakes and marine beaches, the new water quality criteria may be extended to inland waters (IWs). Similarities and important differences between coastal waters (CWs) and IWs that should be considered when developing criteria for IWs were the focus of an expert workshop. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge and research needed to base IWs microbial criteria on sound science. Two key differences between CWs and IWs are the sources of indicator bacteria, which may modify the relationship between indicator microbes and health risk, and the relationship between indicators and pathogens, which also may vary within IWs. Monitoring using rapid molecular methods will require the standardization and simplification of analytical methods, as well as greater clarity about their interpretation. Research needs for the short term and longer term are described.
dc.identifier.issn0091-6765
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/61659
dc.publisherNational Institute of Environmental Sciences
dc.sourceEnvironmental Health Perspectives
dc.subjectKeywords: analytic method; article; coastal waters; criterion variable; environmental monitoring; environmental protection; epidemiological data; health hazard; knowledge; lake; microbiology; molecular biology; pathogenesis; priority journal; recreation; seashore; Clean water act; Environmental epidemiology; Environmental microbiology; Indicator bacteria; Inland waters; Predictive modeling; Water recreation; Waterborne pathogens
dc.titleMeeting report: Knowledge and gaps in developing microbial criteria for inland recreational waters
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.issue6
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage876
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage871
local.contributor.affiliationDorevitch, Samuel, University of Illinois
local.contributor.affiliationAshbolt, Nicholas J, US Environmental Protection Agency
local.contributor.affiliationFerguson, Christobel, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationFujioka, Roger, University of Hawaii
local.contributor.affiliationMcGee, Charles D., Orange County Sanitation District
local.contributor.affiliationSoller, Jeffrey A., Soller Environmental
local.contributor.affiliationWhitman, Richard L., U.S. Geological Survey
local.contributor.authoruidFerguson, Christobel, a267577
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor050209 - Natural Resource Management
local.identifier.absseo960604 - Environmental Management Systems
local.identifier.ariespublicationf2965xPUB629
local.identifier.citationvolume118
local.identifier.doi10.1289/ehp.0901627
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-77953265899
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Dorevitch_Meeting_report:_Knowledge_and_2010.pdf
Size:
201.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format