Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A unified measure of linear and nonlinear selection on quantitative traits

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Henshaw, Jonathan
Zemel, Yoav

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract

1. Lande and Arnold’s approach to quantifying natural selection has become a standard tool in evolutionary biology due to its simplicity and generality. It treats linear and nonlinear selection in two separate frameworks, generating coefficients of selection (e.g. linear and quadratic selection gradients) that are not directly comparable. Due to this somewhat artificial division, the Lande–Arnold approach lacks an integrated measure of the strength of selection that applies across qualitatively different selection regimes (e.g. directional, stabilizing or disruptive selection). 2. We define a unified measure of selection, the distributional selection differential (DSD), which includes both linear and nonlinear selection. The DSD quantifies total selection on a trait, regardless of the underlying selection regime. 3. The DSD can be partitioned into a directional component, representing selection on the trait mean, and a non-directional component, representing selection on the shape of the trait distribution (e.g. variance, skew or the number of modes). When multiple traits are measured, the DSD can also be separated into direct and correlated effects, analogously to linear selection gradients. As with linear selection differentials, the DSD on a standardized trait is limited in magnitude by the opportunity for selection. 4. The DSD is a general-purpose measure of the total strength of selection. It is particularly valuable where traditional analyses provide limited insight, such as in comparative studies where the shape of selection is variable. Partitioning the DSD into directional and non-directional selection allows biologists to assess whether selection acts consistently in one direction, or in opposing directions over different parts of the trait range

Description

Citation

Source

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31
abcd