Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Preliminary findings from 'the Australian tax system survey of tax scheme investors'

dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Kristinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorByng, Karenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-11-30en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-03-10en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:33:04Z
dc.date.available2005-03-10en_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:33:04Z
dc.date.created2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.description.abstractBetween January and July 2002, researchers at the Centre for Tax System Integrity conducted a national survey of 6000 Australian taxpayers involved in tax planning schemes. According to the Australian Taxation Office (Tax Office) scheme investments were largely funded through tax deductions and relatively little private capital was at risk. The Tax Office therefore believed that these schemes exploited loopholes in the tax law and were designed in such a way to avoid tax. The anti-avoidance provisions of Part IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act were applied to scheme related investments and action was first taken against investors in 1998 to recover the tax owing. Approximately 42 000 investors were issued with amended assessments telling them that they had to pay back taxes, interest and appropriate penalties. Specific issues of interest to the survey researchers were scheme investors’ views of the Tax Office, the Australian tax system and how they believed the Tax Office dealt with the schemes issue. The survey was also designed to identify the possible reasons why taxpayers invested in tax minimisation schemes, why there was such widespread taxpayer resistance against the Tax Office’s debt recovery procedures, and perhaps more importantly, whether the aggressive tax planning market in Australia is supply or demand driven. This report provides a descriptive analysis of some of the more important findings from the survey, followed by a discussion of the key findings and their implications.en_US
dc.format.extent706207 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent347 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/42665en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/42665
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.subjecttaxationen_AU
dc.subjecttaxdeductionsen_AU
dc.subjectAustraliaen_AU
dc.subjectscheme investmentsen_AU
dc.subjectlaw and legislationen_AU
dc.subjecttax planning schemesen_AU
dc.subjecttaxevasionen_AU
dc.titlePreliminary findings from 'the Australian tax system survey of tax scheme investors'en_US
dc.typeWorking/Technical Paperen_US
local.citationNo.40en_US
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_US
local.contributor.affiliationCTSI, RSSSen_US
local.description.refereednoen_US
local.identifier.citationmonthdecen_US
local.identifier.citationyear2002en_US
local.identifier.eprintid2880en_US
local.rights.ispublishedyesen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
40.pdf
Size:
689.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2880-~TM.XSH
Size:
347 B
Format:
Unknown data format