Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Systematics of the mass-asymmetric fission of excited nuclei from 176Os to 206Pb

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Prasad, Edayillam
Hinde, David
Dasgupta, Mahananda
Jeung, Yun
Berriman, Annette
Swinton-Bland, Ben
Simenel, Cedric
Simpson, Ed
Bernard, Remi
Williams, Elena

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Elsevier

Abstract

The competition between the dominant mass-asymmetric and rarer narrow mass-symmetric fission modes in actinide nuclei are controlled by deformed and spherical shell effects. The low energy fission of 180/80Hg was recently observed to be strongly mass-asymmetric, indicating that despite spherical shell gaps in fragments around 90/40Zr, the system does not fission mass-symmetrically. Several theoretical approaches have been used to explain this unexpected result. To investigate the underlying mechanism, systematic measurements of fission mass distributions for isotopes of Os, Pt, Hg and Pb, formed in fusion reactions with p, 12C, 32S, 40,48Ca projectiles, have been made for excitation energies above the fission saddle-point (E*eff) between 2.8 and 28.2 MeV. Evidence for mass-asymmetric fission is widespread, manifested as flat topped mass distributions or significant deviations from a single Gaussian shape. The systematic trends seen cannot be attributed to quasifission. Comparing two-Gaussian fits at a wide range of E⁎, it is concluded that the fit centroids reflect the low energy character of mass-asymmetric fission in the sub-lead region. Quantitative comparisons were made with microscopic calculations by Scamps and Simenel (2019) of fission mass-asymmetries attributed to the influence of shell gaps in both neutrons (N=52, 56 for compact octuple deformations) and protons (Z=34 and Z=42, 44, 46 with large quadrupole deformations). For the predominant fission mode in the calculations, having one elongated and one compact fragment, the results are in extremely good agreement with all experimental values. This provides strong support for both the calculations, and the exploration of mass-asymmetric fission systematics through heavy ion fusion reactions. The total kinetic energy distributions for 176Pt and 180Pt do not show any evidence of a low TKE mass-symmetric fission mode, as had been reported for 178Pt by Tsekhanovich et al. (2019).

Description

Citation

Source

Physics Letters B

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Creative Commons Attribution License

Restricted until

abcd