Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Integrating climate change adaptation and climate-related disaster risk-reduction policy in developing countries: A case study in the Philippines

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

de Leon, Eryn
Pittock, Jamie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Abstract

Developing countries are disproportionately affected by climate-related disasters. These disasters often result in costly catastrophic levels of destruction, which derails a country’s development objectives. Using Birkmann and von Teichman’s [(2010). Integrating disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation (CCA): Key challenges – scales, knowledge, and norms. Sustainability Science, 5(2), 171–184. doi:10.1007/s11625-010-0108-y] framing concepts of scale, norms, and knowledge, this article uses the Philippines as a case study to examine the barriers and opportunities of conjoined CCA and disaster management systems in developing countries. The case study demonstrated that current policy instruments were largely unsuccessful, as they focus on post-disaster impacts rather than mitigating the sources of vulnerability which amplify disaster risk. This is a major deterrent in the current integration of schemes due to the failure to incorporate the relevant actors, appropriate strategies, cost-effective financial structures, and suitable institutional arrangements. Without sustained funding, timely information, and community-level support, implementation on the ground will be difficult. Knowing this, there is a need to change the decision-making structure of the proposed integrated system to include three main aspects: (1) addressing underlying factors of vulnerability as a common, integrated policy objective, (2) recognizing a more meaningful inclusion of informal responses, and (3) taking into account future uncertain climate conditions and pending impacts.

Description

Citation

Source

Climate and Development

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31