Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A rapid assessment of the political economy of health at district level, with a focus on maternal, newborn and child health, in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal and the Philippines

dc.contributor.authorHipgrave, David B
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Ian
dc.contributor.authorSato, Midori
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-22T04:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.date.updated2022-09-18T08:18:11Z
dc.description.abstractLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs) face many challenges and competing demands in the health sector, including maternal and newborn mortality. The allocation of financial and human resources for maximum health impact is important for social and economic development. Governments must prioritize carefully and allocate scarce resources to maximum effect, but also in ways that are politically acceptable, financially and institutionally feasible, and sustainable. Political economy analysis (PEA)—that gets what, when and why—can help explain that prioritization process. We used PEA to investigate how four Asian LMICs (Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal and the Philippines) allocate and utilize resources for maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH). Using mixed research methods including a literature review, field interviews at national and sub-national level, and policy, process and budget analysis in each country, we examined three political economy issues: (1) do these countries demonstrably prioritize MNCH at policy level; (2) if so, is this reflected in the allocation of financial and other resources and (3) if resources are allocated to MNCH, do they achieve the intended outputs and outcomes through actual programme implementation? We also considered the influence of transnational developments. We found that all four countries demonstrate political commitment to health, including MNCH. However, the health sector receives comparatively low public financing, governments often do not follow through on plans or pronouncements, and capacity for related action varies widely. Poor governance and decentralization, lack of data for monitoring and evaluation of progress, and weak public sector human resource capacity were frequent problems; engagement of the private or non-government sectors is an important consideration. Opportunities exist to greatly improve equity and MNCH outcomes in these nations, using a mix of evidence, improved governance, social engagement and the media to influence decisions, increase resource allocation to and improve accountability in the health sector.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are grateful for the efficient support provided by UNICEF’s four country offices, particularly the Chiefs of Health and their national staff, and also by government counterparts who supported this work. The funding of Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID; now DFAT) in Canberra and the role of project partners at the University of Queensland is also acknowledged.en_AU
dc.format.extent11 pages
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0268-1080en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/203368
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherBritish Academy and Oxford University Press
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
dc.sourceHealth Policy and Planning
dc.subjectPolitical economy, maternal health, child health, health financing, priority-setting, South Asia, East Asia, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines
dc.titleA rapid assessment of the political economy of health at district level, with a focus on maternal, newborn and child health, in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal and the Philippines
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-27
local.bibliographicCitation.issue10en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage772en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage762en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHipgrave, David B, UNICEFen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Ian , College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSato, Midori, UNICEF Nepal Country Officeen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidAnderson, Ian , u1481187en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor111799 - Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.absseo920204 - Evaluation of Health Outcomesen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4734594xPUB113en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume34en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1093/heapol/czz082en_AU
local.identifier.essn1460-2237en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85076582868
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000507575000005
local.publisher.urlhttps://academic.oup.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Hipgrave_A_rapid_assessment_of_the_2019.pdf
Size:
375.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format