Conceptual analysis and the coercion thesis
Abstract
In chapter two of Coercion and the Nature of Law, Kenneth Himma sets his defence of the Coercion Thesis – the thesis that it is a conceptual truth, and not merely a practical necessity, that a legal system contains sanctions – within an account of the nature of conceptual analysis. I discuss his account, and the nature of conceptual analysis more widely, explaining why I follow Himma in accepting the Coercion Thesis. I conclude with a short discussion of where I think he misunderstands the distinction between modest conceptual and immodest conceptual analysis.
Description
Citation
Collections
Source
Revus
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access via publisher website
License Rights
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description