Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Is post-operative perfluorocarbon liquid tamponade for macula-on giant retinal tear safer than silicone oil?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Essex, Rohan
Amy M., Sheridan
Yeoh, Jonathan
Allen, Penelope
Campbell, William G
Edwards, Thomas L.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

Abstract

The incidence of unexplained central vision loss immediately following removal of silicone oil (ROSO) has been reported at between 3.3% [1] and 5.9% [2], but may be considerably higher in certain retinal detachment sub-groups. For example, the rate of ROSO maculopathy after macula-on giant retinal tear (GRT) repair was reported as high as 50% [1] in this journal, perhaps suggesting macula-on GRTs (Fig 1), or indeed any macula-on retinal detachment, are uniquely susceptible to ROSO maculopathy.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Eye

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads