Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Getting Shredded: Development and Validation of a Measure of Muscularity-Oriented Disordered Eating

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Cooper, Marita
Griffiths, Kathy
Burns, Richard

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Abstract

This study describes the development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Eating for Muscularity Scale (EMS), a measure of muscularity-oriented disordered eating (MDE) attitudes and behaviors. We conducted a literature review to define the construct of MDE and relevant subdomains. This review informed a large pool of items addressing these subdomains, which were then reduced based on feedback from subject-matter experts. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted to refine the measure and identify latent factors in 2 samples of participants recruited online. Preliminary psychometric evaluation of EMS items was conducted in a subset of the original sample (n = 266). CFA supported a 27-item short form of the measure. The EMS demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .95), moderate to strong concurrent validity with related measures (r = .43-.78), good construct validity using known-group assessment, and strong test-retest reliability (r = .90). These findings provide preliminary support for the EMS as a reliable and valid measure of MDE. The instrument has the potential to support future research to improve clinical understanding and assessment of MDE and its etiology, prevalence, and treatment outcomes. Further studies are required to evaluate the clinical and research utility of the scale. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Description

Citation

Source

Psychological Assessment

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31

Downloads