Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Comparison of SST Diurnal Variation Models Over the Tropical Warm Pool Region

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Zhang, Haifeng
Beggs, Helen
Merchant, Christopher J
Wang, Xiao Hua
Majewski, Leon
Kiss, Andrew
Rodriguez, Jose
Thorpe, Livia
Gentemann, Chelle
Brunke, Michael

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Geophysical Union

Abstract

Four sea surface temperature (SST) diurnal variation (DV) models have been compared against Multifunctional Transport Satellite-1R (MTSAT-1R) SST measurements over the Tropical Warm Pool (TWP) region (90 degrees E-170 degrees E, 25 degrees S-15 degrees N) for 4 months from January to April 2010. The four models include one empirical model formulated by Chelle Gentemann (hereafter CG03), one physical model proposed by Zeng and Beljaars in 2005 (ZB05) and its updated version (ZB+T), and one air-sea coupled model (the Met Office Unified Model Global Coupled configuration 2, GC2) with ZB05 warm layer scheme added on top of the standard configuration. The sensitivity of the v3 MTSAT-1R data to the "true'' changes in SST is first investigated using drifting buoys and is estimated to be 0.60 +/- 0.05. This being significantly different from 1, the models are validated against MTSAT-1R data and the same data scaled by the inverse of the sensitivity (representing an estimate of the true variability). Results indicate that all models are able to capture the general DV patterns but with differing accuracies and features. Specifically, CG03 and ZB+T underestimate strong (> 2 K) DV events' amplitudes especially if we assume that sensitivity-scaled MTSAT-1R variability is most realistic. ZB05 can effectively capture the DV cycles under most DV and wind conditions, as well as the DV spatial distribution. GC2 tends to overestimate small-moderate (< 2 K) DV events but can reasonably predict large DV events. One to three hour lags in warming start and peak times are found in GC2.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until