Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

CONSTITUTIONAL CHARACTERISATION:EMBEDDING VALUE JUDGEMENTS ABOUT THERELATIONSHIP BET WEEN THE LEGISLATUREAND THE JUDICIARY

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Stellios, James

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Monash University Publishing

Abstract

This article considers the process of characterising a Commonwealth law with respect to a federal head of power, organising the enquiry into three distinct steps of determining the essential character of a power, the definitional character of a power and the telescopic character of a power. The article then contends that this constitutional schema of characterisation disguises judicial value judgements about the proper scope of judicial review. The article concludes by reflecting on the application of this schema to the High Court’s decisions in Spence v Queensland (2019) 268 CLR 355 and Love v Commonwealth (2020) 375 ALR 597.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Monash University Law Review

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2099-12-31