Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part II. Uncertainty and mitigation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Lewandowsky, Stephan
Risbey, James
Smithson, Michael
Newell, Ben

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publishers

Abstract

In public debate surrounding climate change, scientific uncertainty is often cited in connection with arguments against mitigative action. This article examines the role of uncertainty about future climate change in determining the likely success or failure of mitigative action. We show by Monte Carlo simulation that greater uncertainty translates into a greater likelihood that mitigation efforts will fail to limit global warming to a target (e.g., 2 °C). The effect of uncertainty can be reduced by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Taken together with the fact that greater uncertainty also increases the potential damages arising from unabated emissions (Lewandowsky et al. 2014), any appeal to uncertainty implies a stronger, rather than weaker, need to cut greenhouse gas emissions than in the absence of uncertainty.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Climatic Change

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31