Scientific uncertainty and climate change: Part II. Uncertainty and mitigation
Loading...
Date
Authors
Lewandowsky, Stephan
Risbey, James
Smithson, Michael
Newell, Ben
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Abstract
In public debate surrounding climate change, scientific uncertainty is often cited in connection with arguments against mitigative action. This article examines the role of uncertainty about future climate change in determining the likely success or failure of mitigative action. We show by Monte Carlo simulation that greater uncertainty translates into a greater likelihood that mitigation efforts will fail to limit global warming to a target (e.g., 2 °C). The effect of uncertainty can be reduced by limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Taken together with the fact that greater uncertainty also increases the potential damages arising from unabated emissions (Lewandowsky et al. 2014), any appeal to uncertainty implies a stronger, rather than weaker, need to cut greenhouse gas emissions than in the absence of uncertainty.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Climatic Change
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31