Alkalinity of ocean island lavas decoupled from enriched source components: A case study from the EM1-PREMA Tasmantid mantle plume

Abstract

The alkalinity of ocean island basalts (OIB), which form by upwelling thermo-chemical instabilities in the mantle, is often associated with the degree of melting. Yet it remains to be tested if alkalinity and the degree of melting are systematically associated with enriched mantle components. The Tasmantid Seamounts, which are fossil remnants of the Tasmantid mantle plume, comprise a north-south age-progressive submarine volcanic chain in the Coral and Tasman Seas East of Australia. Dredged seafloor lavas from nine seamounts along the seamount chain, ranging in age from 50 to 6.5 Ma, show a dichotomy in alkalinity, similar to those observed in other hotspot areas such as Hawai'i or Pitcairn. In radiogenic Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb isotope systematics, Tasmantid Seamount lavas form a continuum between EM1 and PREMA and are thus part of the prevalent EM1-PREMA association in the Pacific. However, their radiogenic Pb isotope systematics mark the Tasmantid plume as an individuum with no resemblance to any other plume. In stable Fe isotopes (expressed as δ57FePrim, which is the Fe isotopic composition calculated to primitive lavas along a liquid line of descent) alkali basalts are, on average, isotopically heavier than tholeiitic lavas, ranging in δ57FePrim from +0.10 to +0.21‰, unrelated to radiogenic isotope systematics, but with co-variations of δ57FePrim and Ti* (which is the primitive melt Ti content). These systematics point towards residual garnet as a key factor and thus indicate a solely petrologic relation between degrees of melting and Fe isotopes. Tholeiitic lavas exhibit a near-depleted mantle like isotopic composition (ranging in δ57FePrim from −0.01 to +0.22‰, median at δ57FePrim + 0.04‰), yet with values of up to δ57FePrim + 0.22‰ that require an isotopically heavy source of unknown origin. The lack of systematics between alkalinity and radiogenic isotope signatures indicates that temperature is the likely driving force for variable melting degrees in some samples over others. Based on these observations, we surmise that tholeiitic lavas form in the plume centre whereas alkaline lavas form at the cooler rim of the conduit. Mixing between melts and associated enriched components in the Tasmantid mantle plume may occur but, at least for alkaline lavas, only on a small scale.