Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

The role of wilderness in nature conservation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Mackey, Brendan
Lesslie, Robert
Nix, Henry A
Incoll, Ryan
Lindenmayer, David B

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Executive summary - Main conclusions: ‘Wilderness’ has been criticised on a number of levels, viz. that it: · is only a cultural concept · has no objective, empirical and hence scientific basis · is irrelevant to nature conservation in general, and biodiversity conservation of in particular Additionally: · wilderness areas tend to be spectacular icon areas that are protected at the expense of more threatened and smaller habitat areas · the conservation of biodiversity is ultimately dependent on off-reserve management rather than wilderness areas, there being a fundamental limit to the amount of land that can be reserved · because humans have inhabited Australia continuously for at least 40,000-50,000 years ‘wilderness’ has little or no relevance · biodiversity conservation requires a focus on the habitat of rare, endangered and threatened species, whose distributions may not be represented in ‘wilderness areas’. The validity of these criticisms is very dependent on matters of definition.

Description

Citation

Source

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

Downloads

File
Description