Intrinsic Utility's Compositionality
Loading...
Date
Authors
Weirich, Paul
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Cambridge Journals
Abstract
To compare the options in a decision problem, a common method
evaluates for each option the world that would result if the option were realized.
This paper argues that one evaluation of an option’s world, intrinsic utility, is
compositional given a division of an option’s world according to the option’s
consequences and other events. The argument first justifies the norm that an
ideal agent should be intrinsically indifferent between two options’ worlds given
that she is intrinsically indifferent between the options’ consequences. Then
it uses this norm and the existence of intrinsic utilities respecting intrinsic
indifference to establish intrinsic utility’s compositionality. The results regulate
human agentswhen they approximate ideal agents in pertinent respects. The paper
begins with a general explanation of compositionality; the related phenomena
of interchangeability, complementarity, and independence; and the effect on
compositionality of context and arrangement of a composite’s parts. After arguing
for intrinsic utility’s compositionality, the paper explains its role in decision
theory.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Journal of American Philosophical Association
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31