Comparing the performance of forced aligners used in sociophonetic research

dc.contributor.authorGonzalez Ochoa, Simon
dc.contributor.authorGrama, James
dc.contributor.authorTravis, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-16T22:37:53Z
dc.date.available2022-06-16T22:37:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.updated2022-10-09T07:16:35Z
dc.description.abstractForced aligners have revolutionized sociophonetics, but while there are several forced aligners available, there are few systematic comparisons of their performance. Here, we consider four major forced aligners used in sociophonetics today: MAUS, FAVE, LaBB-CAT and MFA. Through comparisons with human coders, we find that both aligner and phonological context affect the quality of automated alignments of vowels extracted from English sociolinguistic interview data. MFA and LaBB-CAT produce the highest quality alignments, in some cases not significantly different from human alignment, followed by FAVE, and then MAUS. Aligners are less accurate placing boundaries following a vowel than preceding it, and they vary in accuracy across manner of articulation, particularly for following boundaries. These observations allow us to make specific recommendations for manual correction of forced alignment.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe gratefully acknowledge support from the ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language, and funding from a Transdisciplinary & Innovation Grant (TIG952018). We thank Robert Fromont, Debbie Loakes, and the anonymous Linguistics Vanguard reviewers for valuable feedback on the paper, as well as Miriam Meyerhoff, Jim Stanford, and Hywel Stoakes for help in formulating the ideas presented here.en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2199-174Xen_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/267328
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenancehttps://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/id/publication/31210/..."Author can archive publisher's version/PDF" From SHERPA/RoMEO site as at 17/06/2022en_AU
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Mouton
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE140100041
dc.rights© 2020 The authors
dc.sourceLinguistics Vanguard
dc.subjectforced alignment
dc.subjectaccuracy comparison
dc.subjectsociophonetics
dc.subjectvowels
dc.subjectworkflow optimization
dc.titleComparing the performance of forced aligners used in sociophonetic research
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage13
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1
local.contributor.affiliationGonzalez Ochoa, Simon, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGrama, James, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationTravis, Catherine, College of Arts and Social Sciences, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.authoremailrepository.admin@anu.edu.auen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGonzalez Ochoa, Simon, u1037706en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGrama, James, u1038619en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidTravis, Catherine, u3487939en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor200404 - Laboratory Phonetics and Speech Scienceen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB14308en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume6en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1515/lingvan-2019-0058en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000587353600001
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.degruyter.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Gonzalez+Ochoa_Comparing_the_performance_of_2020.pdf
Size:
2.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format