Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Reproductive factors and specific histological types of breast cancer: prospective study and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorReeves, Gillian K
dc.contributor.authorPirie, Kirstin
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Jane
dc.contributor.authorBull, Diana
dc.contributor.authorBeral, Valerie
dc.contributor.authorBanks, Emily
dc.contributor.authorAustoker, Joan
dc.contributor.authorMillion Women Study, Collaborators
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T22:25:04Z
dc.date.available2015-12-08T22:25:04Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.updated2016-02-24T11:15:44Z
dc.description.abstractLittle is known about how reproductive factors affect the risk of breast cancers of different histology. In an analysis of prospective data on 1.2 million middle-aged UK women, we used proportional hazards models to estimate the relative risks of six histological types in relation to menarche, childbearing and menopause. During 8.7 million person-years of follow-up, 17 923 ductal, 3332 lobular, 1062 tubular, 944 mixed ductal lobular, 330 mucinous and 117 medullary cancers were diagnosed. The effect of both age at menarche and age at first birth was greatest for lobular tumours; relative risks per 5-year increase in age at menarche for ductal, lobular, and tubular cancers were 0.93 (0.87-0.99), 0.65 (0.56-0.76), and 0.75 (0.57-0.98), respectively (P-value for heterogeneity=0.0001); and the relative risks per 5-year increase in age at first birth were 1.10 (1.07-1.12), 1.23 (1.17-1.29), and 1.13 (1.03-1.23), respectively (P-value for heterogeneity=0.0006). Increasing parity reduced the risk of each tumour type, except medullary cancers, but the reduction in risk was greater for mucinous cancers than for any other subtype considered (P<0.05 for comparison with each other subtype in turn). The effect of menopause did not vary significantly by tumour histology. Meta-analysis of published results on the effects of age at menarche and age at first birth on ductal and lobular cancers were in keeping with our findings.
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/33261
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.sourceBritish Journal of Cancer
dc.subjectKeywords: adult; article; breast cancer; cancer diagnosis; cancer risk; comparative study; controlled study; female; follow up; histology; human; intraductal carcinoma; major clinical study; medullary carcinoma; menarche; menopause; middle aged; mucinous carcinoma; Age at first birth; Breast cancer histology; Menarche; Menopause; Parity
dc.titleReproductive factors and specific histological types of breast cancer: prospective study and meta-analysis
dc.typeJournal article
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage544
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage538
local.contributor.affiliationReeves, Gillian K, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationPirie, Kirstin, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationGreen, Jane, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationBull, Diana, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationBeral, Valerie, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationBanks, Emily, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationAustoker, Joan, University of Oxford
local.contributor.affiliationMillion Women Study, Collaborators, NHS Breast Screening Centres
local.contributor.authoruidBanks, Emily, u4106314
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor111706 - Epidemiology
local.identifier.ariespublicationu4637548xPUB100
local.identifier.citationvolume100
local.identifier.doi10.1038/sj.bjc.6604853
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-59649104504
local.identifier.thomsonID000263074900016
local.type.statusPublished Version

Downloads