Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Technical note: Hydrology modelling R packages - A unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspective

dc.contributor.authorAstagneau, Paul C
dc.contributor.authorThirel, Guillaume
dc.contributor.authorDelaigue, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorGuillaume, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorParajka, Juraj
dc.contributor.authorBrauer, Claudia C
dc.contributor.authorViglione, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBuytaert, Wouter
dc.contributor.authorBeven, Keith J
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-15T05:13:52Z
dc.date.available2024-03-15T05:13:52Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2022-11-13T07:16:40Z
dc.description.abstractFollowing the rise of R as a scientific programming language, the increasing requirement for more transferable research and the growth of data availability in hydrology, R packages containing hydrological models are becoming more and more available as an open-source resource to hydrologists. Corresponding to the core of the hydrological studies workflow, their value is increasingly meaningful regarding the reliability of methods and results. Despite package and model distinctiveness, no study has ever provided a comparison of R packages for conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling from a user perspective by contrasting their philosophy, model characteristics and ease of use. We have selected eight packages based on our ability to consistently run their models on simple hydrology modelling examples. We have uniformly analysed the exact structure of seven of the hydrological models integrated into these R packages in terms of conceptual storages and fluxes, spatial discretisation, data requirements and output provided. The analysis showed that very different modelling choices are associated with these packages, which emphasises various hydrological concepts. These specificities are not always sufficiently well explained by the package documentation. Therefore a synthesis of the package functionalities was performed from a user perspective. This synthesis helps to inform the selection of which packages could/should be used depending on the problem at hand. In this regard, the technical features, documentation, R implementations and computational times were investigated. Moreover, by providing a framework for package comparison, this study is a step forward towards supporting more transferable and reusable methods and results for hydrological modelling in R.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the French Ministry of Environment (DGPR/SNRH/SCHAPI), which provided financial support to the PhD grant of the first author. hydromad development has been supported by the Sydney Informatics Hub, a Core Research Facility of the University of Sydneyen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1027-5606en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/316019
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_AU
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbHen_AU
dc.rights© Author(s) 2021.en_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceHydrology and Earth System Sciencesen_AU
dc.titleTechnical note: Hydrology modelling R packages - A unified analysis of models and practicalities from a user perspectiveen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue7en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage3973en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage3937en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAstagneau, Paul C, Universite Paris-Saclayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationThirel, Guillaume, Universite Paris-Saclayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDelaigue, Olivier, Universite Paris-Saclayen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGuillaume, Joseph, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationParajka, Juraj, Technical University Viennaen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBrauer, Claudia C, Wageningen University and Researchen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationViglione, Alberto, Politecnico di Torinoen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBuytaert, Wouter, Imperial College Londonen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBeven, Keith J, Lancaster Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidGuillaume, Joseph, u4220846en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor370704 - Surface water hydrologyen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB21325en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume25en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.5194/hess-25-3937-2021en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85109373677
local.identifier.thomsonIDWOS:000672247500001
local.publisher.urlhttps://hess.copernicus.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
hess-25-3937-2021.pdf
Size:
7.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: