Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Configural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objects

dc.contributor.authorNoudoost, Behrad
dc.contributor.authorAdibi, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorMoeeny, Ali
dc.contributor.authorEsteky, Hossein
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-08T00:04:13Z
dc.date.available2014-10-08T00:04:13Z
dc.date.issued2005-08
dc.description.abstractConfigural processing could develop for non-face visual objects as one becomes familiar with those objects through repeated exposure. To explore the role of familiarity in object recognition, we studied the effect of adaptation to a visual object (adapting stimulus) on the identification performance of other objects (test stimulus) while adapting and test stimuli were exactly the same, shared parts or were completely different. We used a subset of English alphabets (p, q, d and b) as familiar objects and an unfamiliar set of symbols constructed from same parts but with different configurations. Adaptation to a member of each set led to a lower identification performance for that object in a crowding paradigm. Adaptation to each member of the unfamiliar set resulted in decreased identification performance for the same object and those members of the set that shared parts with the adapting stimulus. But no such transfer of adaptation was observed for the familiar set. Our results support the notion that processing of object parts plays an important role in the recognition of unfamiliar objects while recognition of familiar objects is mainly based on configural processing mechanisms.en_AU
dc.format436–441en_AU
dc.identifier.issn0926-6410
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/12120
dc.publisherElsevieren_AU
dc.rightshttp://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0926-6410/ "...Pre-print allowed on any website or open access repository. Voluntary deposit by author of authors post-print allowed on authors' personal website, arXiv.org or institutions open scholarly website including Institutional Repository, without embargo, where there is not a policy or mandate. Publisher's version/PDF cannot be used..." from SHERPA/RoMEO site (as at 3/10/14)en_AU
dc.sourceCognitive Brain Research 24.3 (2005): 436–441en_AU
dc.subjectsensory systemsen_AU
dc.subjectvisual psychophysics and behavioren_AU
dc.subjectconfigural processingen_AU
dc.subjectface recognitionen_AU
dc.subjectidentification performanceen_AU
dc.titleConfigural and analytical processing of familiar and unfamiliar objectsen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAdibi, M, ANU College of Medicine, Biology and Environmenten_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu5347950en_AU
local.description.notesMehdi Adibi was at Shaheed Beheshti university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran at the time of this research.en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished versionen_AU

Downloads