Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Agricultural trade liberalisation and the environment: a global perspective

dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Kymen_AU
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T00:28:26Z
dc.date.available2016-08-01T00:28:26Z
dc.date.issued1992-01
dc.description.abstractNumerous empirical studies have been undertaken in recent years on the extent to which government policies distort incentives to produce and consume farm products, and on the trade and economic welfare consequences of those distortions or their liberalisation (e.g. OECD, 1987 and 1990a; Parikh et al., 1988; Stoeckel et al., 1989; and Tyers and Anderson, 1992). Those studies show clearly that policies of rich countries tend to assist farm sectors with food import barriers and production and export subsidies, that policies of poorer countries tend to discourage farm production, and that both sets of policies reduce economic welfare as conventionally measured. Such studies however, typically say little or nothing about the effects of agricultural policies on the natural environment, and so account for less than the full effects of those policies on social welfare. Neither do they examine environmental policies as part of the package of governmental interventions that are affecting (or could be introduced to affect) agricultural production, consumption and hence trade and welfare. This paper seeks to help redress that imbalance by addressing the question: how would agricultural trade liberalisation by one or more groups of countries affect the natural environment, and hence economic welfare, broadly defined to include not just the consumption of marketed goods and services but also the utility which society derives from the environment?en_AU
dc.format20 pagesen_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0378-5920en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/107080
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherWileyen_AU
dc.rights© Wileyen_AU
dc.sourceThe World Economyen_AU
dc.subjectgovernmenten_AU
dc.subjectpoliciesen_AU
dc.subjectdistorten_AU
dc.subjectincentivesen_AU
dc.subjectfarmen_AU
dc.subjectproductsen_AU
dc.subjecttradeen_AU
dc.subjecteconomicen_AU
dc.subjectwelfareen_AU
dc.subjectexporten_AU
dc.subjectimporten_AU
dc.subjectfooden_AU
dc.subjectagriculturalen_AU
dc.subjectnaturalen_AU
dc.subjectenvironmenten_AU
dc.subjectsocialen_AU
dc.subjectwelfareen_AU
dc.titleAgricultural trade liberalisation and the environment: a global perspectiveen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage172en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage153en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationAnderson, Kym, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, CAP Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidu4042848en_AU
local.description.notesAt the time of publication Kym Anderson was affiliated with the Department of Economics, University of Adelaide, Australia.en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume15en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9701.1992.tb00801.xen_AU
local.identifier.essn1467-9701en_AU
local.publisher.urlhttp://au.wiley.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
884 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: