Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure

dc.contributor.authorKhadka, Jyoti
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Julie
dc.contributor.authorHutchinson, Claire Louise
dc.contributor.authorCleland, Jenny
dc.contributor.authorMulhern, Brendan
dc.contributor.authorLancsar, Emily
dc.contributor.authorMilte, Rachel
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-28T03:48:06Z
dc.date.available2024-10-28T03:48:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2024-02-11T07:15:30Z
dc.description.abstractAbstract Purpose To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. Methods Convergent validity was assessed by examining relationships with other validated preference-based measures (EQ-5D-5L, ASCOT), quality of aged care experience (QCE-ACC) and life satisfaction (PWI) through an online survey. Known-group validity was assessed by testing the ability to discriminate varying levels of care needs, self-reported health and quality of life. Results Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving community-aged care (N = 313) responded; 54.6% were female, 41.8% were living alone and 56.8% were receiving higher-level care. The QOL-ACC and its six dimensions were low to moderately and significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (correlation co-efficient range, ρ = 0.39–0.56). The QOL-ACC demonstrated moderate and statistically significant correlations with ASCOT (ρ = 0.61), the QCE-ACC (ρ = 0.51) and the PWI (ρ = 0.70). Respondents with poorer self-reported health status, quality of life and/or higher-level care needs demonstrated lower QOL-ACC scores (P < 0.001), providing evidence of known-group validity. Conclusions The study provides evidence of the construct validity of the QOL-ACC descriptive system. A preference-weighted value set is currently being developed for the QOL-ACC, which when finalised will be subjected to further validation assessments.
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1885/733722022
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relationhttp://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100664
dc.rights© 2022 The authors
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution licence
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceQuality of Life Research
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectPreference-based measure
dc.subjectResidential-aged care
dc.subjectCommunity-aged care
dc.titleAssessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
dc.typeJournal article
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage2865
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage2849
local.contributor.affiliationKhadka, Jyoti, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationRatcliffe, Julie, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationHutchinson, Claire Louise, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationCleland, Jenny, Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University
local.contributor.affiliationMulhern, Brendan, University of Technology Sydney
local.contributor.affiliationLancsar, Emily, College of Health and Medicine, ANU
local.contributor.affiliationMilte, Rachel, Flinders University
local.contributor.authoremailu3594049@anu.edu.au
local.contributor.authoruidLancsar, Emily, u3594049
local.description.notesImported from ARIES
local.identifier.absfor380108 - Health economics
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB34077
local.identifier.citationvolume31
local.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85131544565
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBya383154
local.publisher.urlhttps://link.springer.com/
local.type.statusPublished Version
publicationvolume.volumeNumber31

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s11136-022-03142-x.pdf
Size:
1.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format