Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure
dc.contributor.author | Khadka, Jyoti | |
dc.contributor.author | Ratcliffe, Julie | |
dc.contributor.author | Hutchinson, Claire Louise | |
dc.contributor.author | Cleland, Jenny | |
dc.contributor.author | Mulhern, Brendan | |
dc.contributor.author | Lancsar, Emily | |
dc.contributor.author | Milte, Rachel | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-28T03:48:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-10-28T03:48:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-02-11T07:15:30Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract Purpose To evaluate the construct (convergent and known group) validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC), an older-person-specific quality-of-life measure designed for application in quality assessment and economic evaluation in aged care. Methods Convergent validity was assessed by examining relationships with other validated preference-based measures (EQ-5D-5L, ASCOT), quality of aged care experience (QCE-ACC) and life satisfaction (PWI) through an online survey. Known-group validity was assessed by testing the ability to discriminate varying levels of care needs, self-reported health and quality of life. Results Older people (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving community-aged care (N = 313) responded; 54.6% were female, 41.8% were living alone and 56.8% were receiving higher-level care. The QOL-ACC and its six dimensions were low to moderately and significantly correlated with the EQ-5D-5L (correlation co-efficient range, ρ = 0.39–0.56). The QOL-ACC demonstrated moderate and statistically significant correlations with ASCOT (ρ = 0.61), the QCE-ACC (ρ = 0.51) and the PWI (ρ = 0.70). Respondents with poorer self-reported health status, quality of life and/or higher-level care needs demonstrated lower QOL-ACC scores (P < 0.001), providing evidence of known-group validity. Conclusions The study provides evidence of the construct validity of the QOL-ACC descriptive system. A preference-weighted value set is currently being developed for the QOL-ACC, which when finalised will be subjected to further validation assessments. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_AU |
dc.identifier.issn | 0962-9343 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1885/733722022 | |
dc.language.iso | en_AU | en_AU |
dc.provenance | This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | |
dc.publisher | Kluwer Academic Publishers | |
dc.relation | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/LP170100664 | |
dc.rights | © 2022 The authors | |
dc.rights.license | Creative Commons Attribution licence | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.source | Quality of Life Research | |
dc.subject | Quality of Life | |
dc.subject | Preference-based measure | |
dc.subject | Residential-aged care | |
dc.subject | Community-aged care | |
dc.title | Assessing the construct validity of the Quality-of-Life-Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC): an aged care-specific quality-of-life measure | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 2865 | |
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 2849 | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Khadka, Jyoti, Flinders University | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Ratcliffe, Julie, Flinders University | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Hutchinson, Claire Louise, Flinders University | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Cleland, Jenny, Health and Social Care Economics Group, Caring Future Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Mulhern, Brendan, University of Technology Sydney | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Lancsar, Emily, College of Health and Medicine, ANU | |
local.contributor.affiliation | Milte, Rachel, Flinders University | |
local.contributor.authoremail | u3594049@anu.edu.au | |
local.contributor.authoruid | Lancsar, Emily, u3594049 | |
local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
local.identifier.absfor | 380108 - Health economics | |
local.identifier.ariespublication | a383154xPUB34077 | |
local.identifier.citationvolume | 31 | |
local.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11136-022-03142-x | |
local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-85131544565 | |
local.identifier.uidSubmittedBy | a383154 | |
local.publisher.url | https://link.springer.com/ | |
local.type.status | Published Version | |
publicationvolume.volumeNumber | 31 |
Downloads
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1