The Garbage Collection Advantage. Improving Program Locality.
| dc.contributor.author | Huang, Xianglong | |
| dc.contributor.author | Blackburn, Stephen | |
| dc.contributor.author | McKinley, Kathryn | |
| dc.contributor.author | Moss, J Eliot B | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Zhenlin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Perry | |
| dc.coverage.spatial | Vancouver Canada | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-13T22:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-12-13T22:38:07Z | |
| dc.date.created | October 14 2004 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2015-12-11T09:40:47Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | As improvements in processor speed continue to outpace improvements in cache and memory speed, poor locality increasingly degrades performance. Because copying garbage collectors move objects, they have an opportunity to improve locality. However, no static copying order is guaranteed to match program traversal orders. This paper introduces online object reordering (OOR) which includes a new dynamic, online class analysis for Java that detects program traversal patterns and exploits them in a copying collector. OOR uses runtime method sampling that drives just-in-time (JIT) compilation. For each hot (frequently executed) method, OOR analysis identifies the hot field accesses. At garbage collection time, the OOR collector then copies referents of hot fields together with their parent. Enhancements include static analysis to exclude accesses in cold basic blocks, heuristics that decay heat to respond to phase changes, and a separate space for hot objects. The overhead of OOR is on average negligible and always less than 2% on Java benchmarks in Jikes RVM with MMTk. We compare program performance of OOR to static class-oblivious copying orders (e.g., breadth and depth first). Performance variation due to static orders is often low, but can be up to 25%. In contrast, OOR matches or improves upon the best static order since its history-based copying tunes memory layout to program traversal. | |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 1581138318 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1885/77403 | |
| dc.publisher | Association for Computing Machinery Inc (ACM) | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and Applications (OOPSLA 2004) | |
| dc.source | 19th Conference on Object-Oriented Progamming, Systems, Languages, and Applications. Conference Proceedings. | |
| dc.subject | Keywords: Adaptive; Compiler-assisted; Generational; Locality; Benchmarking; Costs; Java programming language; Mathematical models; Object oriented programming; Optimization; Real time systems; Software engineering Adaptive; Compiler-assisted; Generational; Locality | |
| dc.title | The Garbage Collection Advantage. Improving Program Locality. | |
| dc.type | Conference paper | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage | 80 | |
| local.bibliographicCitation.startpage | 69 | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Huang, Xianglong, University of Texas | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Blackburn, Stephen, College of Engineering and Computer Science, ANU | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | McKinley, Kathryn, University of Texas | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Moss, J Eliot B, University of Massachusetts | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Wang, Zhenlin, Michigan Technological University | |
| local.contributor.affiliation | Cheng, Perry, IBM Research | |
| local.contributor.authoruid | Blackburn, Stephen, u3789498 | |
| local.description.notes | Imported from ARIES | |
| local.description.refereed | Yes | |
| local.identifier.absfor | 080499 - Data Format not elsewhere classified | |
| local.identifier.ariespublication | MigratedxPub6264 | |
| local.identifier.doi | 10.1145/1035292.1028983 | |
| local.identifier.scopusID | 2-s2.0-17044367876 | |
| local.type.status | Published Version |