Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Robust estimation for finite populations based on a working model

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Kuk, Anthony
Welsh, Alan

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Aiden Press

Abstract

A common scenario in finite population inference is that it is possible to find a working superpopulation model which explains the main features of the population but which may not capture all the fine details. In addition, there are often outliers in the population which do not follow the assumed superpopulation model. In situations like these, it is still advantageous to make use of the working model to estimate finite population quantities, provided that we do it in a robust manner. The approach that we suggest is first to fit the working model to the sample and then to fine-tune for departures from the model assumed by estimating the conditional distribution of the residuals as a function of the auxiliary variable. This is a more direct approach to handling outliers and model misspecification than the Huber approach that is currently being used. Two simple methods, stratification and nearest neighbour smoothing, are used to estimate the conditional distributions of the residuals, which result in two modifications to the standard model-based estimator of the population distribution function. The estimators suggested perform very well in simulation studies involving two types of model departure and have small variances due to their model-based construction as well as acceptable bias. The potential advantage of the proposed robustified model-based approach over direct nonparametric regression is also demonstrated.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until