A gendered self or a gendered context? a social identity approach to gender differences

dc.contributor.authorRyan, Michelle Ken_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-13en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-27T02:16:21Zen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-05T08:30:26Z
dc.date.available2006-03-27T02:16:21Zen_US
dc.date.available2011-01-05T08:30:26Z
dc.date.created2003en_US
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the way in which traditional accounts of gender differences in the self-concept have relied on distal explanatory factors, and have thus conceptualised the gendered self as stable across both time and situation. This notion of a stable, gendered self has been implicated as underlying of a range of psychological gender differences (e.g., Cross & Madson, 1997), such as those in moral reasoning (e.g., Gillian, 1982) and ways of knowing (e.g., Belenky et al., 1989). As a result, these behaviours are also seen to be stable across time and context. An alternative perspective is investigated, which looks to social identity theory and self-categorisation theory for a conceptualisation of both gender and the self-concept as being malleable and context-dependent (e.g., Turner et al., 1987). The social identity perspective describes the way in which proximal aspects of the social context affect the expression of gender-related behaviours, attitudes, and beliefs. In this way, the social identity perspective provides an analysis of group membership, group norms, and social influence which can not only account for the differences that are observed between men and women, but can also offer an analysis of the context-dependence of these difference and an approach by which gender differences can be mollified. A series of nine empirical studies are reported, investigating the way in which individuals (a) define themselves, (b) approach moral reasoning, and (c) approach knowledge and learning, across a number of different social contexts. Together, the results suggest that the self-concept, moral orientation, and ways of knowing are neither stable nor inherently gendered, but are malleable and dependent on the nature of the self-other relationship as defined by the proximal aspects of the social context. The implications for traditional theories of gender differences are discussed, as are the broader implications for feminism and social change.en_US
dc.format.extent1856510 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent356 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent356 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent356 bytesen_US
dc.format.extent356 bytesen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/octet-streamen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/43232en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://digitalcollections.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/43232
dc.language.isoen_AUen_US
dc.subjectsocial identity theoryen_AU
dc.subjectself-categorization theoryen_AU
dc.subjectmoral reasoningen_AU
dc.subjectways of knowingen_AU
dc.titleA gendered self or a gendered context? a social identity approach to gender differencesen_US
local.contributor.affiliationANUen_US
local.contributor.affiliationSchool of Psycholoogy, Faculty of Scienceen_US
local.description.refereednoen_US
local.identifier.citationmonthaugen_US
local.identifier.citationyear2003en_US
local.identifier.eprintid3353en_US
local.rights.ispublishednoen_US

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
thesis_ryan.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format