Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Fiscal Equity In Federal Systems

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Brennan, Geoffrey
Pincus, Jonathan J.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

De Gruyter

Abstract

This paper examines the normative foundations of fiscal equalization an issue handled, apparently decisively, in a classic paper by James Buchanan (1950). Contrary to Buchanan's claims, we argue that fiscal equalization requires extremely strong value judgements at least in the case where fiscal differences arise from the interaction of public goods provision under different population size effectively committing one to a Rawlsian maximin rule. Much weaker forms of the 'social welfare function' in this public goods case will generate the requirement that private consumption levels be equalized, but specifically not public consumption levels in which sense private goods equalization seems normatively weaker than public goods equalization, If this is so, the hope of justifying federal fiscal equalization on the basis of relatively uncontroversial individualistic norms seems illusory.

Description

Citation

Source

Review of Law & Economics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

Open Access

License Rights

Restricted until

Downloads