Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Exploring the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory in general practice: a cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorHunik, Liesbeth
dc.contributor.authorGalvin, Shelley
dc.contributor.authorOlde Hartman, Tim
dc.contributor.authorRieger, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorLucassen, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Kirsty
dc.contributor.authorBoeckxstaens, Pauline
dc.contributor.authorSturgiss, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-09T22:30:11Z
dc.date.available2023-02-09T22:30:11Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.updated2021-12-02T05:02:48Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: The therapeutic alliance is a framework from psychology that describes three components: goals, tasks, and bond. The Working Alliance Inventory adapted for general practice (WAI-GP) measures the strength of the therapeutic alliance between the patient and the clinician, and it could be useful in both research and clinical settings. Aim: To determine if the patient score on WAI-GP can delineate the three components (goals, tasks, and bond), and to test concurrent validity with the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure and the Patient Perception of Patient-Centredness (PPPC) measure. Design & setting: A cross-sectional study took place in 12 general practice waiting rooms in Australia. Method: The research instruments included the 12-item WAI-GP (the patient version), the CARE and PPPC measures, plus a survey of demographics and reason for consultation. To perform a principal components factor analysis of the WAI-GP, this dataset was combined with an existing dataset. The Spearman rank correlation was used to determine concurrent validity between the WAI-GP and the CARE and PPPC measures. Results: Participants (97-99%) reported a strong positive alliance after the consultation (average WAI-GP mean 4.27 +- 0.67 out of 5, n = 146). Factor analysis could not separate the three components (one factor, eigenvalue >1; Cronbach’s α = 0.957; n = 281). Concurrent validity was supported by moderate correlations with the other measures (PPPC ρ = -0.51, P<0.005, CARE ρ = 0.56, P<0.005). Conclusion: Three components could not be identified, but the WAI-GP has a high internal consistency and concurrent validity with moderate correlations with the CARE and PPPC. A more diverse sample may better distinguish the three components leading to more specific feedback to clinicians on their consultation practices.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the 2016 Chris Silagy Research Scholarship grant from the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (SIL16 575968).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn2398-3795en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/285109
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.provenanceCC BY licenseen_AU
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_AU
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020, The Authorsen_AU
dc.rights.licenseCreative Commons Attribution Licenseen_AU
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_AU
dc.sourceBJGP Openen_AU
dc.titleExploring the psychometric properties of the Working Alliance Inventory in general practice: a cross-sectional studyen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.issue1en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage9en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage1en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationHunik, Liesbeth, Radboud Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGalvin, Shelley, MAHEC Center for Researchen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationOlde Hartman, Tim, Radboud Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRieger, Elizabeth, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationLucassen, Peter, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centreen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDouglas, Kirsty, College of Health and Medicine, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationBoeckxstaens, Pauline, Ghent Universityen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSturgiss , Elizabeth , Monash Universityen_AU
local.contributor.authoruidRieger, Elizabeth, u4740611en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidDouglas, Kirsty, u2572713en_AU
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor420300 - Health services and systemsen_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationa383154xPUB18086en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume5en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgpopen20X101131en_AU
local.identifier.scopusID2-s2.0-85102481831
local.publisher.urlhttps://bjgpopen.org/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
bjgpopen20X101131.full.pdf
Size:
596.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
abcd