Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Will International Trade Law inhibit or promote global artificial photosynthesis?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Faunce, Thomas

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

National Taiwan University

Abstract

Artificial photosynthesis (AP) is an area of well-advanced research involving large international groups at the cutting edge of synthetic biology and nanotechnology. In simple terms it offers to produce a cheap source of hydrogen for fuel through using sunlight to split water, as well as making basic starches by a process involving absorption of carbon dioxide via the enzyme RuBisCO. As the proliferating numbers of university-based research teams working in this area begin to combine, there will be a natural escalation of the expected time for a global roll-out ofAP domestic and international devices. Policy attention will then turns to whether international governance systems (particularly including international trade law) will assist or hinder this process. The stakes are high - global AP offers a solution not only to human energy, food and water needs (burning hydrogen fuel creates pure water) but to the rising atmospheric carbon dixide levels linked to climate change problems. This paper begins to examine how governments seeking to promote and subsidize AP products may interact with international trade and investment law. It involves analysis in this context of WTO multilaterais and U.S. bilaterais in relation to intellectual monopoly privileges (IMPs), "Doha-minus" provisions, definitions of technological "innovation, " nonviolation nullification of benefits requirements, textual inhibitions on science-based cost-effectiveness assessment of new technolgies, as well as investor-state dispute settlement provisions.

Description

Citation

Source

Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2037-12-31