Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident
Date
2019-06-17
Authors
Bird, Michael I.
Condie, S. A.
O'Connor, Susan
O'Grady, Damien
Reepmeyer, Christian
Ulm, Sean
Zega, Mojca
Saltré, Frédérik
Bradshaw, Corey
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Abstract
The frst peopling of Sahul (Australia, New Guinea and the Aru Islands joined at lower sea levels) by anatomically modern humans required multiple maritime crossings through Wallacea, with at least one approaching 100km. Whether these crossings were accidental or intentional is unknown. Using coastalviewshed analysis and ocean drift modelling combined with population projections, we show that the probability of randomly reaching Sahul by any route is <5% until ≥40 adults are ‘washed of’ an island at least once every 20 years. We then demonstrate that choosing a time of departure and making
minimal headway (0.5 knots) toward a destination greatly increases the likelihood of arrival. While drift modelling demonstrates the existence of ‘bottleneck’ crossings on all routes, arrival via New Guinea is more likely than via northwestern Australia. We conclude that anatomically modern humans had the capacity to plan and make open-sea voyages lasting several days by at least 50,000 years ago.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Bird, M.I., Condie, S.A., O’Connor, S. et al. Early human settlement of Sahul was not an accident. Sci Rep 9, 8220 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-42946-9
Collections
Source
Scientific Reports
Type
Journal article
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
Open Access
License Rights
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Restricted until
Downloads
File
Description