Chlorhexidine washing in intensive care does not reduce bloodstream infections, blood culture contamination and drug-resistant microorganism acquisition: an interrupted time series analysis
Loading...
Date
Authors
Kengen, R
Thoonen, E
Daveson, Kathryn
Loong, Bronwyn
Rodgers, Helen J
Beckingham, Wendy D
Kennedy, Karina
Suwandarathne, R
van Haren, Frank M. P.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine
Abstract
Background: Health care-associated infections are a major cause of
morbidity and mortality in intensive care patients. The effect of daily
washing with chlorhexidine on these infections is controversial.
Methods: Single-centre, retrospective, open-label, sequential
period, interrupted time series (ITS) analysis in a 31-bed tertiary
referral mixed intensive care unit (ICU), comparing daily washing
with water and soap (from January 2011 to August 2013) with
chlorhexidine washing (from November 2013 to December 2015),
after the introduction of a unit-level policy of chlorhexidine washing.
All patients in the ICU were included in the study, except: if they
were under 18 years of age, if their ICU stay was less than 24
hours (to ensure that all studied patients had at least one exposure
to the daily wash intervention), or if patients had a known allergy
to chlorhexidine. Outcome measures included: clinically significant
positive blood cultures attributable to the ICU stay; contaminated
blood cultures; newly acquired multidrug-resistant microorganisms
(MDRO) such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),
vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) or multidrug-resistant
gram-negative (MRGN) isolates attributable to ICU from clinical and
screening cultures; and newly acquired Clostridium difficile infections
(CDIs). Incidence rates of these outcomes were calculated per 1000
patient days. MDRO acquisition rates were corrected for background
hospital period prevalence rates of MDRO.
Results: A total of 6634 patients were included in the study. ITS
analysis showed no significant level or slope changes in any of the
outcome measures after implementation of chlorhexidine washing.
The incidence rate of clinically significant positive blood cultures
during the chlorhexidine period compared with the water and soap
period was 3.6 v 4.7 (P = 0.37); blood culture contamination rates
were 11.8 v 9.5 (P = 0.56); incidence rates of new ICU-associated
MDRO acquisitions were 3.22 v 3.69 (P = 0.27); incidence rates of
new CDI were 2.01 v 0.79 (P = 0.16). Outcomes after adjustment for
known and potential confounders were similar.
Conclusions: In this real-world, long term ICU study, implementation
of a unit-level policy of daily washing with chlorhexidine impregnated
cloths was not associated with a reduction in the rates of ICUassociated
clinically significant positive blood cultures, blood culture
contamination, newly acquired MDRO isolates, and CDIs.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
DOI
Restricted until
2099-12-31
Downloads
File
Description