Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Can Solomon Islands escape its clientelist trap?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Wood, Terence

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Abstract

In one sense, Solomon Islands has performed remarkably well as a democracy since independence in 1978. It has not lapsed into autocracy and has held elections at regular intervals. In another sense, however, Solomon Islands has been much less successful as a democratic nation-state. Democracy has not brought good political governance. And poor governance has contributed to development problems. In this chapter I explain why democracy has not brought better governance. The explanation hinges on the clientelist nature of the country’s electoral politics and the political incentives clientelism generates. I also look at possible pathways to improving political governance in Solomon Islands.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Book Title

Governance and Democracy in the Asia-Pacific

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

DOI

Restricted until

2099-12-31