Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

On high fertility rates in developing countries: birth limits, birth taxes, or education subsidies?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Shi, Yuhua
Zhang, Jie

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Springer

Abstract

In this paper, we consider two types of population policies observed in practice: birth limits and birth taxes. We find that both achieve very similar equilibrium solutions if tax revenue finances lump-sum transfers. By reducing fertility and promoting growth, both birth policies may achieve higher welfare than conventional education subsidies financed by income taxes. A birth tax for education subsidies can achieve the first-best solution. The welfare gain of the first-best policy may be equivalent to a massive 10-50% rise in income, depending on the degree of human capital externalities and the elasticity of intertemporal substitution.

Description

Citation

Source

Journal of Population Economics

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2037-12-31