Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

Reliably discriminating stock structure with genetic markers: Mixture models with robust and fast computation

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Foster, Scott D
Feutry, Pierre
Grewe, Peter M
Berry, Oliver
Hui, Francis
Davies, Campbell R

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley-Blackwell

Abstract

Delineating naturally occurring and self-sustaining subpopulations (stocks) of a species is an important task, especially for species harvested from the wild. Despite its central importance to natural resource management, analytical methods used to delineate stocks are often, and increasingly, borrowed from superficially similar analytical tasks in human genetics even though models specifically for stock identification have been previously developed. Unfortunately, the analytical tasks in resource management and human genetics are not identical—questions about humans are typically aimed at inferring ancestry (often referred to as “admixture”) rather than breeding stocks. In this article, we argue, and show through simulation experiments and an analysis of yellowfin tuna data, that ancestral analysis methods are not always appropriate for stock delineation. In this work, we advocate a variant of a previously introduced and simpler model that identifies stocks directly. We also highlight that the computational aspects of the analysis, irrespective of the model, are difficult. We introduce some alternative computational methods and quantitatively compare these methods to each other and to established methods. We also present a method for quantifying uncertainty in model parameters and in assignment probabilities. In doing so, we demonstrate that point estimates can be misleading. One of the computational strategies presented here, based on an expectation–maximization algorithm with judiciously chosen starting values, is robust and has a modest computational cost.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Molecular Ecology Resources

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until

2099-12-31