Reciprocal brokered deposits, bank risk, and recent deposit insurance policy
Abstract
This study provides new evidence regarding reciprocal brokered deposits (RBDs), regulatory responses, and bank risk, contributing to prior studies in four ways. First, using updated financial Call Report data and bank failure data through 2012, we re-examine the moral hazard hypothesis that banks using RBDs exhibit higher risk. Second, we uncover a previously overlooked positive association between RBDs and banks' cost of failure. Third, we apply Granger causality tests; and finally, we test whether the FDIC's recent revision of its pricing discourages the use of RBDs and weakens its association with bank risk. The findings provide a more precise and nuanced understanding of banks' use of RBDs.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Collections
Source
North American Journal of Economics and Finance
Type
Book Title
Entity type
Access Statement
License Rights
Restricted until
2037-12-31
Downloads
File
Description