Cultural advice

The Australian National University acknowledges, celebrates and pays our respects to the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people of the Canberra region and to all First Nations Australians on whose traditional lands we meet and work, and whose cultures are among the oldest continuing cultures in human history.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples are advised that ANU Library collections may include images, names, voices, and other representations of deceased persons.

Material in the collection may contain terms, language or views that reflect the period in which the item was created and may be considered inappropriate today.

A combined geochemical and mu CT study on the CO2 reactivity of Surat Basin reservoir and cap-rock cores: Porosity changes, mineral dissolution and fines migration

dc.contributor.authorPearce, J. K.
dc.contributor.authorDawson, G. K. W.
dc.contributor.authorGolab, A.
dc.contributor.authorKnuefing, Lydia
dc.contributor.authorSommacal, Silvano
dc.contributor.authorGolding, S. D.
dc.contributor.authorRudolph, V.
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-09T04:23:09Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-25
dc.date.updated2019-08-25T08:17:52Z
dc.description.abstractGeological storage of CO2 generally involves injection of a CO2 stream into a high porosity and permeability reservoir, contained by one or more overlying low permeability formations. Sandstone reservoirs and associated cap-rocks of targeted CO2 storage sites therefore have distinct properties such as porosity and mineral contents. Their geochemical response or reactivity to injected supercritical CO2 and associated changes in porosity, and permeability affecting scaling, mineral trapping, injectivity, or migration can therefore be very different. Six drill core samples including quartz-rich sandstones, calcite cemented sandstones, and feldspar or clay-rich cap-rocks from a proposed demonstration site in the Surat Basin, Australia, were characterized before and after reaction with pure supercritical CO2 and low salinity formation water. The quartz-rich sandstones have low reactivity, and maintain high porosities with visible pore connectivity after reaction, they are unlikely to be affected by scaling. Kaolin and fine grain movement observed via μCT and SEM could have the potential to open or plug pores, potentially increasing or decreasing permeability and CO2 injectivity. Calcite cemented sandstones had the greatest measured change in porosity after reaction via calcite dissolution. Narrow angular channels were formed in the calcite cement around framework grains, extending through to the center of the sub-plug in the courser grained rock, and surface roughness increased. Solution pH was however quickly passivated. The highest concentrations of Ca, Mn, Sr, and Mg were released to solution from calcite dissolution. Clay (and feldspar) rich cap-rock core had mainly microporosity and the smallest initial pore throat diameters associated with clays. Small changes to μCT calculated porosities after reaction were related to a decrease in chlorite X-ray density, and dissolution of patchy carbonate minerals. Pores were disconnected in μCT images, except for some created horizontal connection along a sandy lamination in a cap-rock. Dissolved concentrations of Ca, Fe, Si, Sr, Mn, Li and Mg increased via dissolution of both carbonate and silicate minerals. Dissolved Ca, Fe, Mn and Mg from silicate minerals in the cap-rock were available for longer term mineral trapping of CO2. Potential increases in porosity and migration will be highest in the calcite cemented zones, while clay-rich cap-rocks could be expected to maintain integrity. There is a low likelihood of mineral trapping or scaling in the quartz rich lower Precipice Sandstone. Overlying rocks can provide Fe, Mg, Ca for mineral trapping of CO2 as ferroan carbonates such as siderite, ankerite and dolomite over longer time scales when pH is buffered. Changes to porosity, mineral content, and water chemistry after pure CO2 reaction observed here and in other published studies were dependent on mineral content and fluid accessibility. These results could be generalized to other sandstone reservoirs where it is expected to inject CO2. The results can also be used to validate geochemical models to build longer term predictions.en_AU
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors wish to acknowledge financial assistance provided through the Australian National Low Emissions Coal Research and Development (ANLEC R&D).en_AU
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_AU
dc.identifier.issn1750-5836en_AU
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1885/196760
dc.language.isoen_AUen_AU
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_AU
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltden_AU
dc.sourceInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Controlen_AU
dc.subjectSurat Basinen_AU
dc.subjectPrecipice sandstoneen_AU
dc.subjectEvergreen formationen_AU
dc.subjectHutton sandstoneen_AU
dc.subjectCO2 sequestrationen_AU
dc.titleA combined geochemical and mu CT study on the CO2 reactivity of Surat Basin reservoir and cap-rock cores: Porosity changes, mineral dissolution and fines migrationen_AU
dc.typeJournal articleen_AU
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-11-15
local.bibliographicCitation.lastpage24en_AU
local.bibliographicCitation.startpage10en_AU
local.contributor.affiliationPearce, J. K., University of Queenslanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationDawson, G. K. W., University of Queenslanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGolab, A., FEIen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationKnuefing, Lydia, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationSommacal, Silvano, College of Science, ANUen_AU
local.contributor.affiliationGolding, S. D., University of Queenslanden_AU
local.contributor.affiliationRudolph, V., University of Queenslanden_AU
local.contributor.authoruidKnuefing, Lydia, u4032292en_AU
local.contributor.authoruidSommacal, Silvano, u4002921en_AU
local.description.embargo2037-12-31
local.description.notesImported from ARIESen_AU
local.identifier.absfor040201 - Exploration Geochemistryen_AU
local.identifier.absseo859899 - Environmentally Sustainable Energy Activities not elsewhere classifieden_AU
local.identifier.ariespublicationu3102795xPUB2374en_AU
local.identifier.citationvolume80en_AU
local.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.11.010en_AU
local.identifier.thomsonID4.54008E+11
local.publisher.urlhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/en_AU
local.type.statusPublished Versionen_AU

Downloads

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
01_Pearce_A_combined_geochemical_and_mu_2019.pdf
Size:
12.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
abcd