Deconstructing Graeme: Observations on Pragmatic Psychology, Forensics, and the Institutional Epistemology of the Courts

Date

Authors

Dowdle, Michael

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Abstract

Daniel Fishman's paradigm of pragmatic psychology seeks to mediate the culture wars between proponents of scientific approaches to psychology and proponents of postmodern approaches to psychology by constructing an epistemological framework that is serviceable to both kinds of approaches. The courts' position within the larger constitutional order severely limits their capacity to deploy the postmodernist aspect of pragmatic psychology. On the other hand, pragmatic psychology's scientific aspect could be of significant service to forensic psychology, because many complain that a weak scientific foundation severely limits the utility of forensic psychology to courts of law.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Source

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Book Title

Entity type

Access Statement

License Rights

Restricted until